The ThinkQuest activity I chose for my future classroom is Children's Creative Theater. This activity explains the basics of stage plays and dramas for younger children. I love that it has different sections for vocabulary terms, small skits for practice, and games and fun activities to go along with it. I found CSO's as early as first grade to go along with this activity, and I think that the sooner students are exposed to this vocabulary and information, the better off they will be when facing larger plays like that of Shakespeare studied in upper middle and high school grades.
RLA.O.1.3.1
listen, recite and respond to familiar stories, poems,
nursery rhymes, songs and stories with repeated patterns (e.g., retell in
sequence, relate information to own life, describe character – setting – plot,
engage in creative and dramatic play, imagine beyond the story).
RLA. O.1.3.3
create a real or imaginary experience with oral and/or
visual communication.
I chose to read the Preparing Tomorrow's Leaders blog on the Best Practices website. This blog talks about a teacher who teaches in an EL school and uses Expeditionary Learning in her classroom as instruction. The teacher writes that as she began teaching, she tried to steer toward being the "fun" teacher, and while students enjoyed her class, she was worried that they may not have learned the skills they needed.
She changed her teaching style to more hands-on learning and saw a significant change in her students' grades. Expeditionary Learning is very similar to what I know as Problem-Based Learning. Her students took part in authentic, meaningful assignments that required them to use skills other than the knowledge gained from the CSO's and skill drills. Through these assignments, students are made to make decisions based on their own judgment and beliefs, determine fact from fiction, derive information from many sources of media, construct projects, and reflect on their learning and findings.
I think this blog supports culturally responsive teaching because the teacher demonstrates how the students are still learning and succeeding, but are doing so in a more relatable and authentic way. The students are able to use their own devices to come to an understanding and skill-build by using real-world experiences and issues that are relevant to their lives.
From
reading the many articles and references about language barriers and deficits
that seem to stray from “Standard English”, it is evident to me that teachers
need to change their approach of teaching language and reading to ensure that
each student’s needs and backgrounds are understood and met. Teachers must
understand the backgrounds and home lives of their students to acknowledge where
their skills of language and literacy come from. Just simply believing that a
child from the Appalachian Region will always be inferior to other readers because
of their low socioeconomic status or accent is a very negative way to begin
language and literacy instruction. In order to assist students in the
development of reading and writing skills, it is important to understand their
previous knowledge and skills in order to move forward. Students should not be
condemned for using what they bring to the classroom, but celebrated for what
they can achieve by using what they know.
“…as part of this stance of accepting the children as learners, it is
necessary to accept their language as that with which they learn, and use that
language to help them begin their education” (Purcell Gates, 2002).
Many
teachers and public schools are contributing to poor literacy and language
instruction perhaps without even noticing. Many teachers believe that by
teaching students Standard English, they are helping improve their language
skills for future employment opportunities. However, the way many are going
about instruction can be very damaging to a student’s psyche. By correcting a
student’s speaking or writing, they are making the student feel as though they
are wrong, not necessarily just the language. This can give students a negative
attitude toward the entire school environment and hinder their desire to learn
Standard English. The attitude portrayed by the corrective teacher is one who
sees the student from a language deficit perspective. The fact that the
student may speak differently from others does not mean that they are unable to learn and be
corrected. If the teachers were willing to be more open-minded and view the
many varieties of language skills in the classroom as language differences,
the attitudes of everyone involved would change and the students and teachers
could build from the foundations each child brings to literacy and language
instruction.
“Basically, the importance that the attitudes teachers have toward
English dialects in the classroom cannot be understated. When teachers ‘correct’
a child’s English, they must be aware that the correction goes deeper than just
the child’s speech” (Rowland & Marrow, 2010).
Teachers
can overcome cultural deficit perspectives of their students by making them
feel like they are fast learners, even if they are learning English as a second
language. Luis Moll’s research article explains that by allowing students to
use their skills in meaningful tasks and projects, they are learning just as
much if not more than by using the facts and drills approach. Students must be
praised for their accomplishments, no matter how great or small. If they are
able to use their skills in another way to gain knowledge, they should be able
to do so without having to abandon what they previously know to pick up on what
the teacher thinks they should know.
“We believe that a meaning-centered model…allows bilingual students to
take full advantage of their first language abilities, and to surpass the
limits set by their more limited knowledge of their second language” (Moll,
1992).
Literacy
instruction can be improved for speakers of non-Standard English if the
teachers of these students accept them for their differences and help them
build on them to learn the basics. If all students in the classroom setting are
accepted and feel a sense of comfort and support, they will gain cultural
capital among their peers and the teacher. Everyone brings different
experiences into the classroom and learns differently. The Funds of Knowledge
article makes the valid point that if students are allowed to use their prior
skills and knowledge without scrutiny, they can be successful readers and
writers. Liz Phillips says it best in the article Honoring Dialect and Increasing Student Performance in Standard English:
“I know my kids as individuals, and this is who they are. It’s my
responsibility to teach the learning standards, but not to change them or take
away their dialect” (Epstein & Herring-Harris, 2011).
The Where I am From project was a great
example of culturally responsive teaching. It incorporated many of the
characteristics of culturally responsive strategies. The video and poem we
created helped build bridges of meaningfulness between our home and school
experiences. By watching our classmates’ photo stories, we were able to see
where our peers grew up, what their parents were like, and even where they
graduated or attended school. This allowed us to see what types of experiences
our friends had growing up, and for us to share as well. This project also
encouraged us as students to share our varied perspectives and experiences in
an encouraging and supportive environment. Our peers’ comments on our photo
stories allowed us to see mistakes or helpful additions that we might have
missed. Everyone was positive and supportive throughout this process which gave
us the drive to tell our story as best we were able without fear of being
judged. We all listened and watched each other’s lives put to music and were
able to appreciate everyone in light of their differences.
Culturally
responsive instruction is a vital part of being a teacher. Students must feel
comfortable and confident in order to maintain a drive to learn. When I have my
own classroom, I will make each student feel welcome and instill a sense of
community in my class. In the classroom, I will refrain from correcting non-standard forms of English and will allow my students to use what they know, and build on their
experiences to be successful.